Alter a streaming job
This document explains how to modify the logic in streaming pipelines within RisingWave. Understanding these mechanisms is essential for effectively managing your data processing workflows.
Alter a table or source
To add or drop columns from a table or source, simply use the ALTER TABLE or ALTER SOURCE command. For example:
The new column will be NULL
for existing records.
Alter a materialized view
To alter a materialized view, you need to create a new materialized view and drop the existing one.
For example, suppose we want to add a new column to the materialized view cust_sales
:
Here we create a new materialized view cust_sales_new
with the new column sales_count
:
After the new materialized view is created, we can drop the old materialized view cust_sales
and rename cust_sales_new
to cust_sales
:
Alter a sink
To alter a sink, you will need to create a new sink and drop the old sink. Please check the example from the last section.
If your sink is created based on a materialized view using the CREATE SINK ... FROM ...
statement, you have the option to specify without_backfill = true
to exclude existing data.
Alter streaming jobs with dependencies
If other materialized views or sinks depend upon the modified materialized view, or if multiple materialized views or sinks with dependencies need updating simultaneously, similarly, create all the new ones and then drop all the old ones.
Let’s continue with the previous example, but suppose the upstream orders
is not a table but another materialized view, derived from tables order_items
and price
.
To add a new column sales_count
to cust_sales
, we need to create the new materialized views cust_sales_new
and orders_new
first:
After the new materialized views are created, we can drop the old materialized view cust_sales
and rename cust_sales_new
to cust_sales
:
Why is it not possible to modify a streaming job in place?
Streaming systems like RisingWave need to maintain internal state for streaming operators, such as joins and aggregations. Generally, modifying a materialized view would require consistent changes to the internal state accordingly, which is not always feasible. Let’s see an example.
Given a table adult_users
that tracks the number of users aged ≥ 18.
It was discovered later that the legal definition for adulthood should be set at ≥16. Initially, one might consider modifying the filter condition from age >= 18
to age >= 16
as a straightforward solution. However, this is not feasible in stream processing since records with ages between 16 and 18 have already been filtered out. Therefore, the only option to restore the missing data is to recompute the entire stream from the beginning.
Therefore, we recommend persistently storing the source data in a long-term storage solution, such as a RisingWave table. This allows for the recomputation of the materialized view when altering the logic becomes necessary.
Was this page helpful?